Psychotherapeutic Work with Intergenerational Trauma
Interrupting intergenerational cycles of trauma and violence Part I
In this presentation, Clinical Psychologist, Dr Pamela Alexander discusses the clinical significance of research findings that show that the dynamics of future intimate partner relationships and parenting abilities can be anticipated from early childhood attachments. These findings give us the possibility of considering more exactly how intergenerational patterns of neglect and abuse can predict someone’s capacity for loving relationships – both as a parent and a romantic partner. The parent-child attachment relationship can either exacerbate or mitigate the effects of a history of maltreatment on intergenerational cycles of violence. We will see that intimate partner violence both results from a history of child maltreatment and contributes to these intergenerational cycles through the impact on the child’s ability to regulate emotions and through internal working models of self and other. The trauma history of both partners in childhood is found to be important, however most parents who experienced violence in childhood do not become abusive towards their own children or partners. How are they able to interrupt the intergenerational cycle of trauma? Dr Alexander proposes that alternative sources of attachment, such as a good therapist or one non-abusive parent, can counteract the effects of a history of maltreatment and interrupt the cycle of violence before it reaches the next generation.
Thinking in terms of intergenerational cycles certainly adds another dimension to Attachment Theory as I’m familiar with through many psychotherapy trainings that I’ve done. It brings the various forms of attachment ‘full circle’ – obvious really. But in intergenerational terms perhaps not so much a vicious circle as a spiral of unresolved trauma, loss and confusion; mother to child to adult child/mother to child and on… There’s much for me to consider at a personal level here – very good clear presentation
Wonderful exposition of Attachment theory and its application. This is helpful, also, as a complement to Selma Fraiberg’s brilliant study ‘Ghosts in the Nursery’. The latter seems to imply a significant agency to the gtandparent as a component of mother’s internal world. So that Fraiberg cites Anna Freud’s ‘identification with the aggressor’ as a mechanism of defence and of transmission of trauma. Angela Joyce then identifies the parents’ own Oedipal configuration as the mechanism of the ‘cascading’ of meaning through generations (Joyce IJPA 2016)
This was a useful overview and broad explanation of the relationship between attachment and intergenerational trauma, as well as the myriad of contexts that heighten the likelihood of trauma transmission within families and couples. It was striking to learn that research done around abuse has shown that people who have undergone abuse within their families of origin don’t necessarily experience their abuse as traumatic experiences. It would be helpful to find out more about what role environments outside of the family of origin, e.g. school, extended family, wider community etc. play in disrupting or mitigating trauma for individuals.
I found this lecture by Pamela to be well laid-out and enlightening, by stringing key attachment styles with their surfacing intergenreational T, in a clear manner.
Some features of particular attachment styles were made clearer to me that I had not considered before.
I found this lecture by Pamela to be well laid-out and enlightening, by stringing key attachment styles with their surfacing intergenreational T, in a clear manner.
Some features of particular attachment styles were made clearer to me that I had not considered before.