Historical Origins of Embodied Approaches to Psychotherapy
The origins of most of the embodied approaches to psychotherapy reside mainly in specific developments at the end of the 19th century with the work of(see Boadella, 1997), who was a pupil of (1825-1893) at the Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital in Paris, when Freud was studying there in 1885. Janet became one of the pre-eminent neurologists of the period. Contrary to common belief, Freud’s early therapy takes up Janet’s and Charviot’s embodied focus. For example, Freud would lie on the floor with his clients, massage them, and apply physical pressure (Totton, 2002), an approach which he of course wholly abandoned in his later work.
There were several other notable attempts to explore the potential of psycho-physical aspects of healing, for instance by Hippolyte Bernheim (1890), William James (1980) and Carl Lange in the 1890s. Michael Heller’s (2012) comprehensive book on Body Psychotherapy details such mind-body explorations. However, it was not until the 1920s, in Vienna, that the specific somatic (embodied) aspects in psychotherapy were developed through the work of an unorthodox pupil of Freud’s, Wilhelm Reich.
While Freud’s own theories moved away from his original concept of libido as a quantitative, body-based sexual energy, Reich maintained this position and made it even more concrete. Reich also emphasised Freud’s original view that no neurosis was possible in the presence of a normal healthy sexual life. By 1927, Reich believed he had plainly demonstrated this, and accumulated these theories and findings into his first major book, later entitled .
Reich now examined the resistances to analysis that led to frequent failures in therapy. Basing his work on clinical examples, he argued that patients generally defended themselves against the interpretation and exploration of their deeper feelings in a characteristic style, which was identical with the style in which they defended themselves in life. He began to consider these patterns of resistance, thus developing an analysis of character. This he later expounded in his classic (1933) work, , but while the first half of this book was and still is widely respected within psychoanalysis, the move in the second half towards body psychotherapy and energy work took him even further away from Freud.
Reich suggested that the analysis needed to: (a) be systematic; (b) have a clear goal; and (c) work directly with the patient’s defence mechanisms, which he conceptualised as embodied in the form of character ‘armour’ – often muscular rigidities restricting the person to certain (often neurotic) patterns of behaviour and ways of being. These patterns of armouring were based on the frustrated natural impulses of the child at certain key points in their psychosocial development: they embodied both the impulse and its repression. This led Reich to become increasingly interested in how the wider society (and not just the parents) seemed to function to repress the child’s instincts. He speculated that neuroses could even be preventable with better-informed parenting.
At that time in Vienna there was a lot of social unrest and socialist and communist ideas were becoming popular. Reich embraced many of these perspectives enthusiastically, even being invited to visit Russia briefly, and he attempted to combine Marxist socio-economic views with psychoanalytic theories. This led to the establishment of free ‘sex hygiene’ clinics giving help and information, which included support for contraception and some terminations. However, few other analysts embraced these views and Reich found himself being increasingly marginalised. His increasing differences with Freud and developments in psychoanalysis in Germany eventually led Reich to move to Berlin in 1930. Initially, he made good contacts with other German analysts, including, who had preceded him from Vienna. Much of his day-to-day work was with the communist-backed Sexpol movement, an extension of his earlier health clinics, paralleled with seeing clients, writing and teaching.
Reich also became involved with a dancer, Elsa Lindenberg, and this relationship eventually broke up his marriage. Those frenetic three years (1930-33) ended abruptly with the National Socialist ‘putsch’ and he had to flee Germany, especially having just published, , another book that was seen as far ahead of its time. had trained with Elsa Gindler and was very aware of how emotions are held and liberated vegetatively in the body. It was at least partly through the contact with her way of working (as well as a result of their relationship) that Reich actually started working directly with people’s bodies – the real start of Body Psychotherapy (Young, 2012). Based in various temporary residences in Denmark and Sweden from 1933-1934, he started to train people in what he later called, ‘Character-Analytic Vegetotherapy’, and eventually settled in Oslo, Norway (1934 to 1949) leaving just ahead of the Second World War and the immanent Nazi invasion.
In America, Reich had to start all over again. He supported himself through his therapy work and training, but much of his work went into developing theories about universal ‘life energy’, which he called ‘Orgone’. In 1942, he founded the Orgone Institute and the Orgone Institute Press. Reich’s presence as a radical, sex-affirming figure in the conservative 1950s USA led to his persecution and eventual imprisonment. After his death in 1957, several of his trainees, under the leadership of Ellsworth Baker kept quite strictly to his methods within the.
Two of Reich’s trainees, (1958); (1965); (1967); (1970); (1972); (1975); (1977); (1980). Other forms of embodied psychotherapy followed – many acknowledging connections with Reich’s work.and John Pierrakos developed a set of therapeutic practices based on his work that they called ‘ ‘. This form of embodied psychotherapy was popularised by Alexander Lowen’s series of readable books that included
The growth of(particularly in America in the 1960s) was responsible for a resurgence of interest in a variety of embodied forms of psychotherapy, known variously as ‘ ‘, ‘Body-Oriented Psychotherapy’ or ‘ ‘ – though these terminologies were not fully adopted until later in the 1990s. The way that Reich’s ideas were taken up in this new theoretical context meant that his work became seen as humanistic rather than psychoanalytic, the approach within which he would have insisted he belonged.
Reich is succeeded by many eminent practitioner-theorists. , had had analysis with Reich in Berlin in the 1930s but never really acknowledged Reich’s influence upon his recognition that the body played a very important and significant role in the development of the whole human psyche., the founder of
Charles (Chuck) Kelley (1982), an ophthalmologist, inspired by Reich’s work on energy blocks (especially in the Ocular segment), developed a therapy he called ‘‘.
Eva Reich, his daughter, research colleague and a qualified paediatrician, developed a special baby (“butterfly-touch”) massage for babies in incubators that she later called ““.
Emotional Anatomy, how the ‘armouring’ was also present in the soft tissues, like the tubes and spaces of the viscera. He developed what he calls “ “, with branches in and .(1986) took up Reich’s work on “character armour” and explored this his seminal book,
” and ““.took some of his earlier Gestalt training (from Esalen), picked up on Reich’s orgasm theories (1973), and integrated them with a number of body and psychotherapies (including yoga) and developed his “ ” (1989), writing books like “
“, which combined body-oriented psychotherapy with a (Budddhist-Native American form of) mindfulness practice that has grown and developed further in the USA and Canada, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and Japan.(1990), developed what he called, “
Rubenfeld Synergy‘, writing a book called “”(1998) later combined Gestalt Therapy with the Feldenkrais Method and the Alexander Technique (both different forms of ‘body therapy’) into what she called ‘
And there were several other developments in the field of embodied psychotherapy in the USA: Christine Caldwell, the director of the Somatic Psychology program at Naropa University in Boulder Colorado and author of “” (1996), developed an integration of Body Psychotherapy (Somatic Psychology) and Dance Movement Psychotherapy into what she called, ‘‘ (2002).
Another director at Naropa, Susan Aposhyan, combined Bonny Bainbridge Cohen’s ‘Body-Mind’ therapy work into a development that she called “” (1998) that later developed into a full-blown “” (2007).
developed by Thomas Pope in Santa Rosa CA, uses another form of mindfulness practice to help ordinary people access various mental health support facilities and resources.
In Europe, there were some significantly different developments: the pupils that Reich left behind in Norway resumed their work after the war.was pre-eminent, continuing his work in Character-Analytic Vegetotherapy. He was also the therapist for David Boadella, Gerda Boyesen, and several others. , renowned as a child psychotherapist, had known Reich in Berlin and then trained with him in Norway.
Energy & Character, which ran for about 40 years, was the only international journal devoted to body-oriented psychotherapy in Europe at that time. In it, people shared their theories, case histories and writings. David Boadella went on to develop his own form of embodied psychotherapy, ‘‘, writing his (1986) book, “Lifestreams” about his work.(1973) who founded the journal
Psychomotoric Psychotherapy‘, which – in many ways – paralleled Reich’s vegetotherapy. Gerda Boyesen went on to develop her own form of neo-Reichian psychotherapy, which she called ‘‘, publishing a lot of her work in Energy & Character. When in London, pupils of hers founded the where a more contemporary form of Body Psychotherapy grew up (Hartley, 2008) and later cross-fertilised with other UK practitioners and with American relational psychoanalysis into a form of ‘ ‘ (Young, 2012). Another colleague of Boyesen, Jacob Stattman, had developed ‘Unitive Body-Psychotherapy‘, which has become popular in Holland and Germany.had trained with , a well-known physiotherapist, who had worked with psychiatrist (another pupil of Reich’s) to develop her ‘
Lisbeth Marcher, a Danish physiologist, influenced by Trygve Braatoy and Lillemor Johnsen, developed ‘‘ and her 2010 book “” traces the developmental sequence in which psychological and emotional elements are linked to specific muscles.
In the 1990s, all these disparate elements started to come together under the aegis of the European Association of Body Psychotherapy (. There is also another peer-reviewed journal, , published by Taylor & Francis.) which,with its sister organisation, the United States Association of Body Psychotherapy ( ) now leads developments in this field, publishing the
Today Body Psychotherapy (and/or Somatic Psychology) is increasingly accepted as a representation of the mainstream within psychotherapy, parallel to psychodynamic psychotherapy, humanistic and integrative psychotherapy, and cognitive-behavioural therapy. The recent publication (Marlock, et al., 2015) of also helps to establish the embodied psychotherapies, once considered as quite radical but today regarded as also coherent, professional, ethical and effective.